DoesTheMath

Stiebel Eltron DHC 4-2

0.95 UEF DOE CCD · 2026-09-19
F

Grade F: where this UEF sits among the 271 models in its class, lowest (G) to highest (A). A position, not an official label. How the grade is set

An electric tankless unit, very small draw pattern (small units - a single bathroom, or a point-of-use heater under a sink).

If you are checking the Stiebel Eltron DHC 4-2 against the federal registry, it uses 622 kWh of electricity a year. That figure applies to the very small draw pattern, the standard daily hot-water usage DOE tests against. It sits 7 kWh above the 615 kWh median of the 271 electric tankless models in that class.


Energy use per year

622 kWh a year

Computed by this site from the registry's UEF and the federal test's daily hot-water draw for this draw pattern. What it costs depends on the electricity rate where you live.

That is above the median of 615 kWh for the 271 models registered in the same heater type and draw pattern; it ranks 152 of 271, lowest energy first.

This model: 622 kWh

Solid line: this model (622 kWh). Dashed line: the class median.

Min 562 kWh Median 615 kWh Max 649 kWh

DOE CCD · 2026-09-19

Report an issue with this number


What it costs to run where you live

Enter your ZIP to see what this unit costs to run a year on your own utility’s electricity rate.


What the registry files

UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) how much hot water you get for each unit of energy the heater uses
0.95 DOE CCD · 2026-09-19 Compared only with other models registered as an electric tankless unit at the very small draw pattern.
Draw Pattern the standard daily usage profile DOE tests the unit against
Very small DOE CCD · 2026-09-19
Maximum Gallons Per Minute how many gallons a minute it can heat while running continuously
0.4 gal/min DOE CCD · 2026-09-19

What it costs to install

$1,303–$1,814 installed

Not a quote — a modeled range of what installers have charged for this class of unit; your price will vary with labor rates, access, and local code requirements.

Escalation indexes: equipment (BLS PPI) latest available: August 2026; labor (BLS ECI) latest available: April 2026 to June 2026.

NLR REMDB (BLS PPI/ECI escalated) · 2026-04-01

Report an issue with this number


Safety record

No CPSC recall names this model.

Checked against the CPSC recall database. CPSC does not publish a model-level match for this product category, so this list is curated by hand from the manufacturer's recall filings.

CPSC · 2026-09-24

What these figures mean

This site computed the 622 kWh figure. The registry does not publish it. It combines the registry's UEF, the ratio of hot water delivered to energy used, with the DOE test's daily hot-water draw for this draw pattern. For the DHC 4-2, the UEF is 0.95, from DOE CCD data retrieved on 2026-09-19. The 271 models registered as electric tankless units at the very small draw pattern are ranked by energy use, and this model is 152nd lowest. That places it in the second-highest quarter of its class for energy use. The figure holds only at the federal test's daily draw, and the site has no estimate for other usage levels. The steps are set out in how the annual energy and cost figures are calculated.

The very small draw pattern covers small units: a single bathroom, or a point-of-use heater under a sink. The registry lists a maximum flow rate in gallons per minute of 0.4 for the DHC 4-2. Its 622 kWh figure and its 152nd rank both describe that kind of use. A reader checking the model for one sink or one small bathroom is comparing it under the conditions it was tested in. A reader who needs hot water at several fixtures at once is outside those conditions, and this page gives no figure for that case. For a different use, the selector by fuel, space and size sorts models by those needs. To compare this unit with others in its own class, use the same-class replacement search by model number.

This text does not give a running cost, because that cost depends on your own utility electricity tariff. The page works it out from your ZIP in the cost calculator on your own ZIP. On any one tariff, the cost gap to a median model comes from the 7 kWh a year of electricity that separates this unit from the 615 kWh class median. No cost is stated here for usage above or below the federal test's daily draw. The installed-price range appears in its own block, with its source and date. It is a modeled installed-cost range, not a quote, and this text does not repeat its figures.

DOE CCD · 2026-09-19

How this compares

The closest models in the same class — same fuel, type and draw pattern.


Keep going

UEF 0.95 · Grade F Price it on your ZIP