DoesTheMath

A. O. SMITH HETF-55 1**

0.94 UEF DOE CCD · 2026-09-19
G

Grade G: where this UEF sits among the 194 models in its class, lowest (G) to highest (A). A position, not an official label. How the grade is set

An electric tank, high draw pattern (a larger household, or one where showers and laundry overlap).

For a larger household, or one where showers and laundry overlap, the A. O. SMITH HETF-55 1** uses 5,278 kWh of electricity a year at the high draw pattern, the standard daily hot-water usage DOE tests against. That is 3,972 kWh above the class median of 1,306 kWh across 194 electric tank models.


Energy use per year

5,278 kWh a year

Computed by this site from the registry's UEF and the federal test's daily hot-water draw for this draw pattern. What it costs depends on the electricity rate where you live.

That is above the median of 1,306 kWh for the 194 models registered in the same heater type and draw pattern; it ranks 172 of 194, lowest energy first.

This model: 5,278 kWh

Solid line: this model (5,278 kWh). Dashed line: the class median.

Min 1,002 kWh Median 1,306 kWh Max 5,334 kWh

DOE CCD · 2026-09-19

Report an issue with this number


What it costs to run where you live

Enter your ZIP to see what this unit costs to run a year on your own utility’s electricity rate.


What the registry files

UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) how much hot water you get for each unit of energy the heater uses
0.94 DOE CCD · 2026-09-19 Compared only with other models registered as an electric tank at the high draw pattern.
Draw Pattern the standard daily usage profile DOE tests the unit against
High DOE CCD · 2026-09-19
First Hour Rating how many gallons of hot water the unit can deliver in one hour, starting from a full tank
75 gal DOE CCD · 2026-09-19
Rated Storage Volume the tank size in gallons
55 gal DOE CCD · 2026-09-19

What it costs to install

$1,879–$2,711 installed

Not a quote — a modeled range of what installers have charged for this class of unit; your price will vary with labor rates, access, and local code requirements.

Escalation indexes: equipment (BLS PPI) latest available: August 2026; labor (BLS ECI) latest available: April 2026 to June 2026.

NLR REMDB (BLS PPI/ECI escalated) · 2026-04-01

Report an issue with this number


Safety record

No CPSC recall names this model.

Checked against the CPSC recall database. CPSC does not publish a model-level match for this product category, so this list is curated by hand from the manufacturer's recall filings.

CPSC · 2026-09-24

What these figures mean

The figure of 5,278 kWh is calculated by this site, not published by the registry. It starts from the registry's UEF, the ratio of hot water delivered to energy used, which is 0.94. The site applies it to the daily hot-water draw the DOE test sets for the high draw pattern. The fuel is electricity, and the source is DOE CCD, retrieved 2026-09-19. Among the 194 electric tank models registered at this draw pattern, the model ranks 172nd lowest for energy use, which puts it in the highest quarter of its class for energy use. The figure describes the test draw only. Use in a specific home is not available here.

The first hour rating, the gallons of hot water available in the first hour from a full tank, is 75 gallons on a rated volume of 55 gallons. These figures describe capacity for the household the high draw pattern represents: a larger one, or one where showers and laundry overlap. For that household, the model uses 5,278 kWh a year at the test draw. A reader who compares models mainly by low electricity use should note the 172nd lowest position among 194. The water heater selector filters by fuel, space and size, and the same-class replacement finder works from a model number. The registry data used here does not say whether 75 gallons meets a given household's peak demand.

Running cost is not written as an amount in this text because it depends on the electricity tariff of the reader's own utility. The cost calculator applies the rate for the reader's ZIP to the 5,278 kWh shown for the high draw pattern. The annual cost methodology explains how that calculation is done. The gap of 3,972 kWh from the class median of 1,306 kWh is also a difference in energy, so the same rate turns it into a cost difference. The modeled installed-cost range appears in its own block with its source and date, and this text does not restate it.

DOE CCD · 2026-09-19

How this compares

The closest models in the same class — same fuel, type and draw pattern.


Keep going

UEF 0.94 · Grade G Price it on your ZIP