HTP EVG080****** vs HUBBELL MP80F: which uses less energy?
At the high draw pattern the HTP EVG080****** uses 5,334 kWh a year and the HUBBELL MP80F 5,392 — 58 kWh (1%) less, about 580 kWh over ten years. Both are filed as an electric tank your utility can shift to off-peak hours, so the comparison holds. Enter your ZIP below to price the difference.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as an electric tank your utility can shift to off-peak hours at the high draw pattern.
| Figure | HTP EVG080****** | HUBBELL MP80F |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.93 (better) | 0.92 |
| Energy use per year (kWh) | 5,334 (better) | 5,392 |
| First hour rating (gal) | 86 | 83 |
| Rated storage volume (gal) | 78 | 80 |
| Installed cost range | not published | not published |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the HTP EVG080****** if running cost matters most: it uses 58 kWh less a year on the same test.
- Pick the HUBBELL MP80F if it is the one you can get installed sooner or for less — on the filed figures it has no advantage over the HTP EVG080******.
- Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 86 gallons of hot water — neither lists more. Check whether a 75-gallon heater is enough.
Each model on its own
-
HTP EVG080******
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
HUBBELL MP80F
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.