AMERICAN STANDARD WATER HEATERS ENS50L-* vs ARISTON ENS40LUB*: which uses less energy?
At the low draw pattern the AMERICAN STANDARD WATER HEATERS ENS50L-* uses 2,362 kWh a year and the ARISTON ENS40LUB* 2,439 — 77 kWh (3%) less, about 770 kWh over ten years. Both are filed as an electric tank, so the comparison holds. Enter your ZIP below to price the difference.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as an electric tank at the low draw pattern.
| Figure | AMERICAN STANDARD WATER HEATERS ENS50L-* | ARISTON ENS40LUB* |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.95 (better) | 0.92 |
| Energy use per year (kWh) | 2,362 (better) | 2,439 |
| First hour rating (gal) | 55 | 50 |
| Rated storage volume (gal) | 41 | 36 |
| Installed cost range | $1,683–$2,577 | $1,591–$1,802 |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the AMERICAN STANDARD WATER HEATERS ENS50L-* if running cost matters most: it uses 77 kWh less a year on the same test.
- Pick the ARISTON ENS40LUB* if the installed price matters more than the running cost: its modeled installed range is $1,591–$1,802 against $1,683–$2,577.
- Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 55 gallons of hot water — neither lists more. Check whether a 40-gallon heater is enough.
Each model on its own
-
AMERICAN STANDARD WATER HEATERS ENS50L-*
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
ARISTON ENS40LUB*
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.