A. O. SMITH T-H3S-OS-N 1** vs JOHN WOOD ATHR-180M 1**: which uses less energy?
At the high draw pattern the JOHN WOOD ATHR-180M 1** uses 178 therms a year and the A. O. SMITH T-H3S-OS-N 1** 180 — 2 therms (1%) less, about 19 therms over ten years. Both are filed as a gas tankless unit, so the comparison holds. Enter your ZIP below to price the difference.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as a gas tankless unit at the high draw pattern.
| Figure | A. O. SMITH T-H3S-OS-N 1** | JOHN WOOD ATHR-180M 1** |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.94 | 0.95 (better) |
| Energy use per year (therms) | 180 | 178 (better) |
| Max flow (GPM) | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Installed cost range | $2,311–$3,350 | $2,358–$3,405 |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | yes |
| On the market since | not filed | 2024-02-01 |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the JOHN WOOD ATHR-180M 1** if running cost matters most: it uses 2 therms less a year on the same test.
- Pick the A. O. SMITH T-H3S-OS-N 1** if it is the one you can get installed sooner or for less — on the filed figures it has no advantage over the JOHN WOOD ATHR-180M 1**.
- Neither if you need more than 5.3 GPM at the same time — neither unit lists more. Check how to size a tankless unit by GPM.
Each model on its own
-
A. O. SMITH T-H3S-OS-N 1**
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
JOHN WOOD ATHR-180M 1**
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.