DoesTheMath
Menu

Ruud PRO H65 T2 RH310BM vs State HPTV-66 2**: which uses less energy?

An asterisk in a model number stands for any character: one filing covers several variants.

At the high draw pattern the Ruud PRO H65 T2 RH310BM uses 1,417 kWh a year and the State HPTV-66 2** 1,550 — 133 kWh (9%) less, about 1,329 kWh over ten years. Both are filed as an electric tank, so the comparison holds. Enter your ZIP below to price the difference.


Side by side

Compared within one class only: models filed as an electric tank at the high draw pattern.

Filed and computed figures
Figure Ruud PRO H65 T2 RH310BM State HPTV-66 2**
UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) 3.5 (better) 3.2
Energy use per year (kWh) 1,417 (better) 1,550
First hour rating (gal) 75 76
Rated storage volume (gal) 59 68
Installed cost range NLR REMDB $3,449–$4,282 $3,707–$4,067
ENERGY STAR certified ENERGY STAR yes yes
Sound level (dB) ENERGY STAR not filed 45
Refrigerant ENERGY STAR R-134a, GWP 1430 R-513A, GWP 630
On the market since ENERGY STAR 2020-04-30 2023-07-10
CPSC recall naming it CPSC none on file none on file

DOE CCD · 2026-09-19 NLR REMDB · 2026-04-01 ENERGY STAR · 2026-09-19 CPSC · 2026-09-24


What it costs to run

  • Ruud PRO H65 T2 RH310BM 1,417 kWh a year
  • State HPTV-66 2** 1,550 kWh a year

Ruud PRO H65 T2 RH310BM is 133 kWh a year lower than State HPTV-66 2**.

DOE CCD · 2026-09-19

Report an issue with this number

Enter your ZIP to price both units on the same rate where you live.


Reliability

Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.

The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.

What is here instead:

  • The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side above.
  • No CPSC recall on file names either model (list checked 2026-09-24).
  • Both are ENERGY STAR certified, which requires a manufacturer warranty of at least six years; the actual term for each model is not published.
  • Time on the market, as filed with ENERGY STAR: the Ruud PRO H65 T2 RH310BM since 2020-04-30, the State HPTV-66 2** since 2023-07-10. A sale date, not a lifespan.

Which should you pick?

  • Pick the Ruud PRO H65 T2 RH310BM if running cost matters most: it uses 133 kWh less a year on the same test.
  • Pick the State HPTV-66 2** if you need more hot water in your busiest hour: it lists a first hour rating of 76 gallons against 75.
  • Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 76 gallons of hot water — neither lists more.

Each model on its own