Rheem XG55T06EC50U0 vs Richmond PRO+G55-50N RH59: which uses less energy?
At the high draw pattern the Rheem XG55T06EC50U0 and the Richmond PRO+G55-50N RH59 use the same energy, 273 therms a year each, on the same federal test. Both are filed as a gas tank, so the comparison holds; what separates them is below. Enter your ZIP to price either one on your own rate.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as a gas tank at the high draw pattern.
| Figure | Rheem XG55T06EC50U0 | Richmond PRO+G55-50N RH59 |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| Energy use per year (therms) | 273 | 273 |
| First hour rating (gal) | 97 | 91 |
| Rated storage volume (gal) | 55 | 55 |
| Installed cost range NLR REMDB | $1,777–$3,088 | $1,777–$3,088 |
| CPSC recall naming it CPSC | none on file | none on file |
DOE CCD · 2026-09-19 NLR REMDB · 2026-04-01 CPSC · 2026-09-24
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side above.
- No CPSC recall on file names either model (list checked 2026-09-24).
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the Rheem XG55T06EC50U0 if you need more hot water in your busiest hour: it lists a first hour rating of 97 gallons against 91.
- Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 97 gallons of hot water — neither lists more. Check whether a 50-gallon heater is enough.
Each model on its own
- Rheem XG55T06EC50U0 273 therms a year
- Richmond PRO+G55-50N RH59 273 therms a year