Rheem PROG40S-36N RH67 PV vs Ruud PRO+G40S-40N RH67 PD: which uses less energy?
At the medium draw pattern the Rheem PROG40S-36N RH67 PV and the Ruud PRO+G40S-40N RH67 PD use the same energy, 171 therms a year each, on the same federal test. Both are filed as a gas tank, so the comparison holds; what separates them is below. Enter your ZIP to price either one on your own rate.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as a gas tank at the medium draw pattern.
| Figure | Rheem PROG40S-36N RH67 PV | Ruud PRO+G40S-40N RH67 PD |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| Energy use per year (therms) | 171 | 171 |
| First hour rating (gal) | 66 | 69 |
| Rated storage volume (gal) | 39 | 39 |
| Installed cost range | $1,716–$2,950 | $1,716–$2,950 |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the Rheem PROG40S-36N RH67 PV if its price or availability suits you — on energy the two are level.
- Pick the Ruud PRO+G40S-40N RH67 PD if you need more hot water in your busiest hour: it lists a first hour rating of 69 gallons against 66.
- Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 69 gallons of hot water — neither lists more. Check whether a 40-gallon heater is enough.
Each model on its own
-
Rheem PROG40S-36N RH67 PV
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
Ruud PRO+G40S-40N RH67 PD
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.