MRCOOL MEWH40S82S1 vs Richmond PROE40 T2 RH CG: which uses less energy?
At the medium draw pattern the MRCOOL MEWH40S82S1 and the Richmond PROE40 T2 RH CG use the same energy, 3,531 kWh a year each, on the same federal test. Both are filed as an electric tank, so the comparison holds; what separates them is below. Enter your ZIP to price either one on your own rate.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as an electric tank at the medium draw pattern.
| Figure | MRCOOL MEWH40S82S1 | Richmond PROE40 T2 RH CG |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| Energy use per year (kWh) | 3,531 | 3,531 |
| First hour rating (gal) | 55 | 55 |
| Rated storage volume (gal) | 37 | 36 |
| Installed cost range | $1,605–$1,828 | $1,591–$1,802 |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the MRCOOL MEWH40S82S1 if its price or availability suits you — on energy the two are level.
- Pick the Richmond PROE40 T2 RH CG if it is the one you can get installed sooner or for less — on the filed figures it has no advantage over the MRCOOL MEWH40S82S1.
- Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 55 gallons of hot water — neither lists more. Check whether a 40-gallon heater is enough.
Each model on its own
-
MRCOOL MEWH40S82S1
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
Richmond PROE40 T2 RH CG
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.