Midea MEWH30T82S1 vs Rheem PROE30 2 RH95 MH: which uses less energy?
At the low draw pattern the Midea MEWH30T82S1 and the Rheem PROE30 2 RH95 MH use the same energy, 2,439 kWh a year each, on the same federal test. Both are filed as an electric tank, so the comparison holds; what separates them is below. Enter your ZIP to price either one on your own rate.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as an electric tank at the low draw pattern.
| Figure | Midea MEWH30T82S1 | Rheem PROE30 2 RH95 MH |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| Energy use per year (kWh) | 2,439 | 2,439 |
| First hour rating (gal) | 47 | 47 |
| Rated storage volume (gal) | 28 | 27 |
| Installed cost range | $1,475–$1,602 | $1,461–$1,577 |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the Midea MEWH30T82S1 if its price or availability suits you — on energy the two are level.
- Pick the Rheem PROE30 2 RH95 MH if it is the one you can get installed sooner or for less — on the filed figures it has no advantage over the Midea MEWH30T82S1.
- Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 47 gallons of hot water — neither lists more. Check whether a 30-gallon heater is enough.
Each model on its own
-
Midea MEWH30T82S1
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
Rheem PROE30 2 RH95 MH
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.