MARATHON MR40245 C vs Richmond PROPH40 T0 RH120: which uses less energy?
At the medium draw pattern the Richmond PROPH40 T0 RH120 uses 1,254 kWh a year and the MARATHON MR40245 C 3,531 — 2,277 kWh (64%) less, about 22,766 kWh over ten years. Both are filed as an electric tank, so the comparison holds. Enter your ZIP below to price the difference.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as an electric tank at the medium draw pattern.
| Figure | MARATHON MR40245 C | Richmond PROPH40 T0 RH120 |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.92 | 2.59 (better) |
| Energy use per year (kWh) | 3,531 | 1,254 (better) |
| First hour rating (gal) | 51 | 43 |
| Rated storage volume (gal) | 38 | 37 |
| Installed cost range | $1,620–$1,853 | not published |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the Richmond PROPH40 T0 RH120 if running cost matters most: it uses 2,277 kWh less a year on the same test.
- Pick the MARATHON MR40245 C if you need more hot water in your busiest hour: it lists a first hour rating of 51 gallons against 43.
- Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 51 gallons of hot water — neither lists more. Check whether a 40-gallon heater is enough.
Each model on its own
-
MARATHON MR40245 C
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
Richmond PROPH40 T0 RH120
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.