eyoo EA65EH vs Midea MGWH150ISNN: which uses less energy?
At the medium draw pattern the eyoo EA65EH and the Midea MGWH150ISNN use the same energy, 135 therms a year each, on the same federal test. Both are filed as a gas tankless unit, so the comparison holds; what separates them is below. Enter your ZIP to price either one on your own rate.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as a gas tankless unit at the medium draw pattern.
| Figure | eyoo EA65EH | Midea MGWH150ISNN |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| Energy use per year (therms) | 135 | 135 |
| Max flow (GPM) | 3.9 | 3.7 |
| Installed cost range | $1,745–$2,687 | $1,745–$2,687 |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the eyoo EA65EH if its price or availability suits you — on energy the two are level.
- Pick the Midea MGWH150ISNN if it is the one you can get installed sooner or for less — on the filed figures it has no advantage over the eyoo EA65EH.
- Neither if you need more than 3.9 GPM at the same time — neither unit lists more. Check how to size a tankless unit by GPM.
Each model on its own
-
eyoo EA65EH
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
Midea MGWH150ISNN
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.