Chronomite CM vs State UPVA-70E 1**: which uses less energy?
An asterisk in a model number stands for any character: one filing covers several variants.
At the very small draw pattern the Chronomite CM uses 628 kWh a year and the State UPVA-70E 1** 642 — 14 kWh (2%) less, about 137 kWh over ten years. Both are filed as an electric tankless unit, so the comparison holds. Enter your ZIP below to price the difference.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as an electric tankless unit at the very small draw pattern.
| Figure | Chronomite CM | State UPVA-70E 1** |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.94 (better) | 0.92 |
| Energy use per year (kWh) | 628 (better) | 642 |
| Max flow (GPM) | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Installed cost range NLR REMDB | $1,300–$1,790 | $1,294–$1,742 |
| CPSC recall naming it CPSC | none on file | none on file |
DOE CCD · 2026-09-19 NLR REMDB · 2026-04-01 CPSC · 2026-09-24
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side above.
- No CPSC recall on file names either model (list checked 2026-09-24).
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the Chronomite CM if running cost matters most: it uses 14 kWh less a year on the same test.
- Pick the State UPVA-70E 1** if it is the one you can get installed sooner or for less — on the filed figures it has no advantage over the Chronomite CM.
- Neither if you need more than 0.7 GPM at the same time — neither unit lists more. Check how to size a tankless unit by GPM.
Each model on its own
- Chronomite CM 628 kWh a year
- State UPVA-70E 1** 642 kWh a year