CAMMOO RV-65000B vs CAMMOO RV-65000W: which uses less energy?
At the very small draw pattern the CAMMOO RV-65000B and the CAMMOO RV-65000W use the same energy, 23 therms a year each, on the same federal test. Both are filed as a gas tankless unit, so the comparison holds; what separates them is below. Enter your ZIP to price either one on your own rate.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as a gas tankless unit at the very small draw pattern.
| Figure | CAMMOO RV-65000B | CAMMOO RV-65000W |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.89 (better) | 0.87 |
| Energy use per year (therms) | 23 (better) | 23 |
| Max flow (GPM) | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Installed cost range | $2,075–$3,074 | $1,981–$2,963 |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the CAMMOO RV-65000B if its price or availability suits you — on energy the two are level.
- Pick the CAMMOO RV-65000W if it is the one you can get installed sooner or for less — on the filed figures it has no advantage over the CAMMOO RV-65000B.
- Neither if you need more than 1.6 GPM at the same time — neither unit lists more. Check how to size a tankless unit by GPM.
Each model on its own
-
CAMMOO RV-65000B
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
CAMMOO RV-65000W
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.