BRADFORD WHITE URG250H*N vs Richmond PRO+G50-65N RH62 PDV: which uses less energy?
At the high draw pattern the Richmond PRO+G50-65N RH62 PDV uses 260 therms a year and the BRADFORD WHITE URG250H*N 264 — 4 therms (2%) less, about 41 therms over ten years. Both are filed as a gas tank, so the comparison holds. Enter your ZIP below to price the difference.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as a gas tank at the high draw pattern.
| Figure | BRADFORD WHITE URG250H*N | Richmond PRO+G50-65N RH62 PDV |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.64 | 0.65 (better) |
| Energy use per year (therms) | 264 | 260 (better) |
| First hour rating (gal) | 110 | 111 |
| Rated storage volume (gal) | 46 | 48 |
| Installed cost range | $1,761–$3,058 | $1,849–$3,282 |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the Richmond PRO+G50-65N RH62 PDV if running cost matters most: it uses 4 therms less a year on the same test.
- Pick the BRADFORD WHITE URG250H*N if the installed price matters more than the running cost: its modeled installed range is $1,761–$3,058 against $1,849–$3,282.
- Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 111 gallons of hot water — neither lists more. Check whether a 50-gallon heater is enough.
Each model on its own
-
BRADFORD WHITE URG250H*N
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
Richmond PRO+G50-65N RH62 PDV
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.