DoesTheMath

AMERICAN HPTS-80 2** vs LOCHINVAR HPTV-80 2**: which uses less energy?

At the high draw pattern the AMERICAN HPTS-80 2** uses 1,279 kWh a year and the LOCHINVAR HPTV-80 2** 1,654 — 375 kWh (23%) less, about 3,751 kWh over ten years. Both are filed as an electric tank, so the comparison holds. Enter your ZIP below to price the difference.


Side by side

Compared within one class only: models filed as an electric tank at the high draw pattern.

Filed and computed figures
Figure AMERICAN HPTS-80 2** LOCHINVAR HPTV-80 2**
UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) 3.88 (better) 3
Energy use per year (kWh) 1,279 (better) 1,654
First hour rating (gal) 95 93
Rated storage volume (gal) 82 82
Installed cost range not published not published
ENERGY STAR certified yes yes
Sound level (dB) not filed 45
Refrigerant R-134a, GWP 1430 R-513A, GWP 630
On the market since 2022-06-06 2023-07-10
DOE CCD · 2026-09-19

What it costs to run

AMERICAN HPTS-80 2**: 1,279 kWh a year LOCHINVAR HPTV-80 2**: 1,654 kWh a year

AMERICAN HPTS-80 2** — 1,279 kWh a year LOCHINVAR HPTV-80 2** — 1,654 kWh a year

AMERICAN HPTS-80 2** is 375 kWh a year lower than LOCHINVAR HPTV-80 2**.

DOE CCD · 2026-09-19

Report an issue with this number

Enter your ZIP to price both units on the same rate where you live.


Reliability

Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.

The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.

What is here instead:

  • The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
  • Both are ENERGY STAR certified, which requires a manufacturer warranty of at least six years; the actual term for each model is not published.
  • Time on the market, as filed with ENERGY STAR: the AMERICAN HPTS-80 2** since 2022-06-06, the LOCHINVAR HPTV-80 2** since 2023-07-10. A sale date, not a lifespan.

Which should you pick?

  • Pick the AMERICAN HPTS-80 2** if running cost matters most: it uses 375 kWh less a year on the same test.
  • Pick the LOCHINVAR HPTV-80 2** if it is the one you can get installed sooner or for less — on the filed figures it has no advantage over the AMERICAN HPTS-80 2**.
  • Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 95 gallons of hot water — neither lists more.

Each model on its own