A. O. SMITH ENL-30 1** vs Richmond PROE28 S2 RH95 B: which uses less energy?
At the low draw pattern the Richmond PROE28 S2 RH95 B uses 2,439 kWh a year and the A. O. SMITH ENL-30 1** 2,494 — 54 kWh (2%) less, about 542 kWh over ten years. Both are filed as an electric tank, so the comparison holds. Enter your ZIP below to price the difference.
Side by side
Compared within one class only: models filed as an electric tank at the low draw pattern.
| Figure | A. O. SMITH ENL-30 1** | Richmond PROE28 S2 RH95 B |
|---|---|---|
| UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) | 0.9 | 0.92 (better) |
| Energy use per year (kWh) | 2,494 | 2,439 (better) |
| First hour rating (gal) | 44 | 45 |
| Rated storage volume (gal) | 26 | 26 |
| Installed cost range | not published | not published |
| ENERGY STAR certified | not matched | not matched |
What it costs to run
Reliability
Not published: Reliability, failure rates and each model’s actual warranty term.
The registries these figures come from certify energy performance under a federal test; none of them records how long a unit lasts or how often it fails, so this page does not rank the two on reliability.
What is here instead:
- The filed efficiency, capacity and tank size of both models, side by side below.
- The actual warranty term is printed in each model’s documentation, not in any registry.
Which should you pick?
- Pick the Richmond PROE28 S2 RH95 B if running cost matters most: it uses 54 kWh less a year on the same test.
- Pick the A. O. SMITH ENL-30 1** if it is the one you can get installed sooner or for less — on the filed figures it has no advantage over the Richmond PROE28 S2 RH95 B.
- Neither if your household's busiest hour needs more than 45 gallons of hot water — neither lists more. Check whether a 30-gallon heater is enough.
Each model on its own
-
A. O. SMITH ENL-30 1**
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.
-
Richmond PROE28 S2 RH95 B
Its filed figures, class position and running cost on your ZIP.